Not so long ago the verdict of the jury associated with the lawsuit on talcum powder has left numerous people shocked from around the world. If J&J (Johnson & Johnson) is found guilty and they are ordered to pay out $127 million for compensatory damages, is this in fact proof that is irrefutable that this world-renowned product can result in cancer? In fact, the entire matter is a lot more complex, so it would be best to begin from the very start as well as seek the help of talcum powder attorneys.
About 100 years ago, the director for scientific affairs for Johnson & Johnson, a Dr, Frederick B. Kilmer was the person responsible for the invention of a scented-powder. He originally labeled the product “for toilet and nursery” in its yellow and red vintage cans made out of the tin. The idea was focused on adding a perfume into Italian talcum and then marketing it together with the sanitary napkins for mothers and midwives after childbirth.
The J&J Baby Powder became popular rapidly that it reached a stage that people from across the globe started associating this scent with how a new-born should smell. The aroma was so appealing that a lot of women began to use this powder on their genital area and underwear to achieve a sense of cleanliness and freshness.
Today the product known as talcum powder can be found in numerous cosmetic products with the purpose of preventing irritations, absorbing unpleasant odors and moisture and to dry baby’s skin’s when wearing diapers. This product can also be found in the contraceptive devices such as diaphragms and condoms to minimize friction.
However, years later it has been discovered that talcum is not safe as it was originally believed.
The first of the talcum-powder lawsuits was first filed in the year 2009, by a woman from Sioux Falls, South Dakota by the name of Diane Berg. Diane was an assistant to a physician was diagnosed in 2006 with Ovarian Cancer when she was only 49 years of age. She had been using talcum powder for the majority of her adult life inside her underwear with the purpose of removing bad odors.
She was unaware of the risks, as there were no warnings about the possibility of cancer risk due to long-term exposure. She went onto to file a lawsuit against this pharmaceutical giant, accusing J&J of fraud and gross negligence. In 2013, J&J approached Diane to offer her with a deal. They offered her a settlement of $1.3 million is she agreed to settle the matter out of court and that she would drop the accusations.
But when she discovered that they were asking her to sign a clause of confidentiality, she turned down the offer. She went on to tell the media that she was not interested in the money, she only cared about warning others about the dangers associated with Baby Talcum powder. In a strange turn-of-events, Diane never received any monetary compensation, although the jury in South Dakota confirmed the link between cancer and talcum powder.
However, later in St. Louis, two other judges went onto an order that J&J pay out a total amount of $127 million to 2 other families for damages incurred. One of the sentences is linked to finding this company guilty of failure to warn consumers of the increased risks or cancer, conspiracy, and negligence when using this product in the area of the genitals.
According to the CBS News, the lawyers of a woman by the name of Jackie Fox who later died from cancer after using this powder for many years provided the courts with a vital document. In the internal correspondence, one medical consultant had suggested that denying possible risks may hurt the image of the company. The jury went onto to confirm that J&J was aware of the risks and failed to warn consumers about these risks, making it a crime.
The pharmaceutical giant made the decision to appeal the decision on the courts and fight-back to clear their reputation. If the sentence passed down is not regarded as scientific proof associated with the fact that talcum can result in ovarian cancer, then why is the scientific world not pursuing its verdict regarding the carcinogenicity of talcum.
According to a large-study who has reviewed the majority of the scientific evidence, they went onto explain that there are some practical complexities that the researchers have to overcome to investigate this difficult topic. In fact, talc is not classified as a drug, and no medical reports have been adequately reported or are available to assess risks accurately in the real-world environments.
While many consumers across the globe are still unsure and confused about whether talc is, in fact, dangerous or not, the ACS (American Cancer Society) has offered possible solutions. The corn-starch-based products are regarded as safe, and J&J has even produced their version sold at a similar price.